we know. But we’ve got things to do.

Normal service will be resumed shortly.

Honest.

Popularity: unranked [?]

When I was a kid, I didn’t get a lot in the way of overpriced add-ons for my Spectrum. A joystick was considered essential, so I got one of those (Not essential for me - I preferred the keyboard - but my mother wanted to play Gauntlet without having to sit on the floor) but I never did get a Multiface. One add-on that I did manage to whine annoyingly enough to get given as a Christmas present, though, was the Magnum Light Phaser.

It came with a half dozen games, all of which had something of interest. Operation Wolf being the daddy, of course - in spite of the slow-down every time you fired, it was still highly entertaining - but all of the games were fun for a while.

Of course, six games can only last so long. It was a shame, then, that just about bugger all was released for it after that, and that it didn’t come with any sort of clue as to how to write any software for it. I’m sure we’ve all had an idea for a cool game that could use a light gun, but had no way of doing anything with it.

Well, I’m going to change that for you right now. This here is a little demo program that lets you point and shoot all you like. It works just great on the real, live hardware, and the emulators I’ve tested it with are RealSpectrum, EmuZWin and Spin. Don’t bother using Spin if you want to score anything though, because it won’t work properly - none of the light gun games work properly with it. (Although Spin was absolutely vital for development, what with having a very nice built-in assembler and all.)

First thing’s first, I’m going to explain how the light gun works. It’s fairly straightforward - there’s a sensor in the gun that is geared to detect brightness. That’s why our screen is mostly black - the white square is the target, and when you point the gun at it it senses the brightness. That’s why it also counts as a hit when you shoot the border, so in your projects remember to set the border to black.

I’m afraid there’s a bit of assembly in here, so mind your fingers:

LABELONE:
	ld bc, 65533
	ld a, 14
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 49149
	ld a, 32
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 65533
	in a, (c)
	and 32
	cp 32
	jp z, labelone

	ld bc, 49149
	ld a, 16
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 65533
	in a, (c)
	and 16
	ld c, a
	ld b, 0
	ret

The first half of that checks if we’ve pulled the trigger. If we haven’t, it loops until we have. And when we have, it checks whether or not we’ve hit a target and returns the result to BASIC. So from BASIC, then, we can call this routine with a USR and we get a number back - if it’s 16, then the player’s shot the target. If it’s not, then they haven’t.

Now, what we might just need for more interesting projects is to split this into two routines, like these…

Check For Trigger Pull

	ld bc, 65533
	ld a, 14
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 49149
	ld a, 32
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 65533
	in a, (c)
	and 32
	ld b,0
	ld c, a
	ret

Check For Hit Target

	ld bc, 65533
	ld a, 14
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 49149
	ld a, 16
	out (c), a
	ld bc, 65533
	in a, (c)
	and 16
	ld b,0
	ld c, a
	ret

…and that way we can wait for the trigger to be pulled from BASIC, at which point we can do something else before checking if a target’s been hit.

PseudoBASIC

	LET A = USR (trigger pull address)
	IF A AND 32 THEN (trigger is pulled)
	LET A = USR (hit target address)
	IF A AND 16 THEN (target is hit)

Of course, you’ve probably realised that just shooting a white square is going to get kind of old kind of fast. But there’s things you can do to get around that - like combining the light gun with the old movie player routine and coming up with something like this:

Popularity: 29% [?]

You probably weren’t expecting another installment quite so soon, but since I’ve had an abrupt disruption in my plans for the day I figured I might as well make the most of it. And then I thought “Why don’t I just review some more Speccy games instead?”

So here we are.

American 3d Pool - Zeppelin Games, 1992

Ah, pool - favoured game of people who spend far too much of their time in pubs everywhere. Many’s the time I’ve been challenged to a game of mini-Snooker by someone who’s spent most of their life doing nothing but alternately drinking and playing pool. And every time I decline, on the basis that I am absolutely terrible, having spent very little time in pubs playing pool, they take offence.

When I go to a pub, it’s to have a drink and a chat with likeminded people. It’s not, as a rule, to try to fumble around a table in an effort to not hit any innocent bystanders with a bit of wood while poking balls into the table edges. My goals and those of pool-players have just never crossed over at any point. So please, please, stop asking me to play pool when you know full well that the result is a foregone conclusion. I’m not paying 50p a go to find out that you’re really good at pool and I’m not. I’m not trying to hassle you into a game of Quake, so just go away and let me finish my beer, alright?

Oh, American 3D Pool? Well, look at it. It’s a regular 2D pool game with less balls and with a pointless, badly thought out and badly-drawn 3D view tacked on. Colour-clash all over the shop, and the balls don’t even change size as they get further away from you. It’s about as fun as having a drink with someone intermittently whining that they want to play pool.

American Football - Mind Games, 1984

In my line of reviews it’s not often that I get asked if I want instructions. Naturally, since this is a game from 1984 I don’t want any instructions at all - because if I do ask for them I’m almost certainly going to get seventeen pages of typewriter simulation with lots and lots of beeping.

Sadly that means that when it asks for a defence (’defense’, surely?) all that’s going to happen is I get beeped at and told that I’ve made an illegal play. So, a quick reset and a look at the instructions reveals that there are about a dozen different ‘plays’ for me to print out as a reference while playing. Since I don’t have a printer handy, I just remember about four of them and started the game again. There’s not much point in having a big list, since there’s no clue as to what any of them mean anyway. No diagrams or the like that people who really play American Football get to look at.

So all in all it’s a bit like an American Football management game, only without any of the numbers or anything. Or any sort of tournament options. Or doing anything except calling the plays, in fact. It’s an odd way to play a game; it might as well be a text adventure for all the difference the graphics make. It does what it does well, but… it’s not much fun.

American Football - Softstone, 1984

Sometime in the early eighties, somebody came up with the idea that it’d be really cool if computers beeped when they wanted an input. Not just once, mind you - over and over and over and over until you either press a key or smash the computer into a million tiny pieces. One day I’m going to get my hands on a time machine, and when I do the first thing I do is going to be to get a copy of every set of winning lottery numbers ever. The second thing I do is find out who the person with the bad idea was so that when I go back in time I can murder them horribly before they come up with it, in the hope of never having to hear BEEP BEEP BEEP while I’m picking a team to manage (or whatever).

See, it’s not just those little choices, like picking your team. It’s when you’re at a fairly important menu and considering what approach you’re going to take while managing your ‘football’ team, like, I don’t know, this one:

I didn’t even get to the game - there’s nothing that it could possibly do to make up for that incessant noise. No points for this game.

American Tag Team Wrestling - Zeppelin Games, 1992

One of the best books I’ve ever read is Mick Foley’s autobiography, Have a Nice Day: A Tale of Blood and Sweatsocks. It’s the epic tale of one of the most unhinged wrestlers in its modern history and I recommend it wholeheartedly to everyone.

What I don’t recommend is this wrestling game. Regardless of what characters you pick, there are precisely two types of wrestler - you and the other guy - and regardless of what you do with the controls you’re going to get the crap beaten out of you in short order. You get knocked over and hammered while you’re on the ground, then you get up, are immediately thrown to the ground and then stomped on some more. It’s stupid and pointless.

Nice graphics, though.

Ammytris - Dream Makers Software, 1995

It’s a Tetris clone.

There’s a lot of Tetris clones out there, as I’m sure you’re aware. This… this is excellent. It’s got smooth controls, a fair speed-up from level to level, and a pleasant enough tune in the background too. In fact, it’s better than the last official Tetris game I played, Tetris DS.

There are precisely two flaws with this game - there’s no two player mode, and the ‘next block’ graphic isn’t coloured. Neither of these are particularly bad, either, so I’m quite pleased to give the first real score in absolutely ages - seven out of ten. Hurrah!

Amo del Mundo - Crom Software, 1990

Apparently this is based on a book by Jules Verne. It’s a scrolling shooter in which I can’t tell if I’m actually firing anything, or what’s dangerous and what’s not. I think I’m supposed to be grabbing bits of paper with codes on, but I’ve no idea why since everything’s in Spanish. They’re probably for a bomb or a power plant or something.

Anyway. It’s very bright and colourful, as you can see (and as you’d expect from a Spanish game). And I’ve an inkling that there’s a fairly solid game under it, too. It’s just a little confusing in places; I managed to grab a couple of code thingies by running/flying through and avoiding everything that moved.

Amoto’s Puf - SPE, 1988

I moved house at the beginning of the year. While there was no small amount of stress involved (not least the realisation that a good third of my belongings is made up of Sinclair-related hardware), it also brought some relief. You see, I used to live quite close to a man who believed himself to be the Incredible Hulk. Honestly. Nary a day would pass without him screaming at his colleagues/family members (he repaired cars right across the street from me) and declaring that either they did as they were told, or “I’ll smash!”. What first seemed to be endless entertainment soon became quite tiresome, and I grew to love the double-glazing.

The second most annoying neighbourhood noise was the sound of some wee bairn on a moped. Invariably with an L plate on, as it had been for the preceding five years or so, and always with some damage inflicted on the moped to make it as loud as possible. A fighter jet could have landed in the road and nobody would notice, because the sound of its engines would have been drowned out by the incessant whining of mopeds.

Anyway. This here’s a Spanish clone of ancient arcade machine Head On, only with mopeds rather than cars. It is not particularly interesting or fun, but not as bad as my former neighbours.

Amtrak Rail Pass - Ashley Greenup, 1989

I hate trains. Actually, that’s not entirely true - I don’t hate trains, just the system. I once spent four hours at Guildford waiting for a series of trains that didn’t exist. And I’ve no idea how long I’ve spent at Didcot Parkway (twinned with the seventh circle of hell), but it’s a long time. And don’t get me started on the cost…

So this game is, essentially, a bit like Dante’s Inferno. You get to travel the USA by train. I don’t know if you’re supposed to be going anywhere in particular or just seeing how far you get before you run out of money, or if you’re supposed to be collecting things along the way in some bizarre parody of Trans Am.

Anyway. It took me a little while to figure out the keys, so I’ll tell you what they are in case you want to try it - your options are on the left of the screen, just above the picture window that shows you where you are. 5 and 8 cycle left and right through the options, and 7 selects.

It’s an interesting concept, but I’m not sure how long I can stand pretending to wait for a train.

Well, that wasn’t all bad, I suppose. Next time it’s Amusement Park 4000 and some other games too.

Popularity: 24% [?]

Surprisingly I’ve not spent the entire first half of this year vegging out and watching The Jeremy Kyle Show. I’ve actually been learning C# and how to program the XBox 360. Here’s a video trailer of my current project (albeit from a couple of months ago, so it’s only representative of gameplay and I now have to make another one):

Popularity: 24% [?]

Yes, yes, I know. Let’s just get on with it, shall we?

Amaz1ng - YRS, 2008

It’s a maze. In first person.

It came in sixth place in the 1K category of the 2008 Minigame Competition, so I don’t really want to slag it off. So I’m just going to stop right here.

Amaze - Bytesize, 1983

Huh. It’s the same as Amaz1ng, only about a million times slower, with no full screen view, and no map screen.

I suppose it was twenty-five years before Amaz1ng, so I don’t really want to slag it off. I’ll just leave this one here.

A-Maze - K’Soft, 1986

So, there’s this sort of non-maze. There are holes in the walls that move, and you have to wait for them to get around the screen.

I suppose it was only 1986, so… wait, hang on. 1986 was the year of Gauntlet and Outrun. There’s no excuses for tosh like this. Ugh. Now I remember why I’ve spent the last six months playing programming on my 360 - this long, long string of terrible, terrible games.

So you play the paintbrush. Not the brightly flashing thing that I spent my entire first game trying to control, no - the dull paintbrush way over there in the corner. You have to get the paint and then colour in every square in the maze.

Now while I’ll freely admit that it would be churlish to complain that I could be playing Red Faction: Guerrilla rather than this crap, it’s less so to complain that I could be playing Gauntlet or Turbo Esprit or Quazatron or any of the other much, much better games that came out the same year (and that I won’t get to play until about 2020).

Nul points.

Amazement - Grupo de Trabajo, 1986

As gamers go, I’m pretty old. As Spectrum users go, though, I’m one of the youngsters. I didn’t get my first Speccy until ‘87, and by that time games were being produced mostly by real companies. Folks like Hewson,and Ocean, and US Gold. Professional operations that gave you a product you just bunged in the tape deck and waited for.

Apparently the cut-off for that era was the year I got my Speccy, since this game expects me to LOAD “” CODE and start the game with a RANDOMIZE USR call.

Sadly I don’t know what address the game starts at, so I can’t play it. I’m sure you can imagine exactly how disappointed I am.

Amazing! - Phipps Associates, 1982

It’s a type-in program that makes a maze. (Very, very slowly.) It’s not even a game. I feel robbed, not just by Phipps Associates, for bundling this with their Pocket Book Games compilation, but also by World of Spectrum, for claiming that this is a game when it is clearly not.

On the other hand, it’s quite a cool random maze generator and I can probably nick the code for something I’ll try to sell to 360 users, so it’s not all bad. Ahem.

The Amazing Rocketeer - John Fotou, 2007

Oh no, look at that. 2007? It’s going to be a CGC entry, and I’m going to have suffered another day full of terrible games. Well, let’s hurry up and get it out of the way, eh?

Huh. Well, that’s surprising - it’s actually quite nice to look at. Apparently I’m supposed to fly this little robot geezer around and collect some items, in some sort of brightly-coloured scrolling Jet Set Willy-alike.

Sadly, it doesn’t get any better than the graphics. It’s just too bloody hard! There’s flames all over the floor, and the ’safe’ spots are slopes that guide you right into any flames that you missed while ‘flying’! I don’t know, maybe it’s spending the last six months playing 360 games. Maybe my gaming skills have been degraded by quick-save-quick-load dumbed-down-for-the-kids consoles.

On the other hand, I also can’t get the game to restart after dying, so maybe something else is wrong. I don’t think it’s me.

So, another bunch of games out of the way, and we’re back on the path towards reviewing every Spectrum game ever. Next time I’ll be looking at all things (beginning with) American. Stay tuned!

Popularity: 26% [?]

I’ll start by mentioning the interminable scandal over MPs’ expenses, which is rapidly descending into the land of boredom. Yes, we’re all heartily fed up of these people, but there’s something faintly nauseating about patronising news presenters who are being paid nearly twice as much, asking them snide questions. It’s time to move on, people.

 Now that obligatory topic is out of the way, just a few random thoughts that occurred to me. One, it’s been a while since I’ve posted my random nonsense here, and it’s always worth seeing if any of our 3.5 readers still exist. Two, it took me seven attempts to remember my password. And three, the post title was too much to resist.

 Have you seen that Spring Watch nonsense that’s currently on in the evenings? It basically consists of otherwise-probably-sane individuals getting disproportionately excited over birds being fed and other such excitement. A typical extract involves them cutting away from the birds for some exciting breaking news:

 ”And we now go over to Geoff Featherbrain who has just spotted some badgers!”

“Yes, Fergus, it’s really exciting here. If you look closely you can just see them disappearing off the shot!”

“You mean we waited days to see them and the moment you called us, they buggered off?”

“Er, yeah. Sorry.”

 ”Hmm, ok. Well, look at these lovely chicks!”

Turning to Twitter for a minute (to fulfil the contractual obligation of the title), is it just me, or is it completely crap? I mean, yes, I know I’m completely crap (as that syntax proves.) What I’m trying to say is, can there be anything less pointless than these random updates of what you’re doing throughout the day? Ok, Facebook (of which more in a moment) has status updates, but at least there is some point to Facebook apart from constantly telling people what you’re doing. Apparently.  If anyone has a clue what Twitter is for, answers on a postcard please.

Just a final word on Facebook. It does have the odd redeeming quality, like the groups about Speccies and YS. But have you noticed how irritating and repetitive its ‘news feed’ is these days? Do I really need to know how many people are setting record scores in Bejewelled Blitz? The ‘friend’ and other suggestions are even worse. ‘Two of your friends are a fan of sleeping in late,’ it pointedly informs me, to which I respond ‘and what about the other 214?’  Do these people get up at the arse crack of dawn every day for the sheer joy of it?

In case anyone happens to be wondering where the Twits come in, you’ll be disappointed if you’re expecting a Roald Dahl feature. It was those darn MPs, y’see. You just weren’t paying attention.

Popularity: 29% [?]